South Africans have waited a very long time for this one. The National Prosecuting Authority now says the Jacob Zuma corruption trial will start on 1 February 2027, with French arms company Thales in the dock next to him.
Why the sudden certainty? Because nobody filed for leave to appeal the latest High Court ruling. For anyone who has followed this saga, that’s an easy sign the case is finally moving.
What the NPA Has Confirmed
According to the NPA, there are no appeals left hanging. In simple terms, the roadblocks that kept this matter stuck have been cleared, at least for now.
NPA spokesperson Kaizer Kganyago told News24 that neither Zuma nor Thales has filed an application for leave to appeal since the ruling in May 2026. So the court’s decision to let the case go ahead still stands.
Back in 2021, both Zuma and Thales pleaded not guilty to racketeering, fraud, corruption and money laundering. Nothing about that has changed. A not guilty plea means the State has to prove its case, and until a court decides otherwise, the accused are presumed innocent.
The May Ruling That Cleared the Way
In May, the High Court in Pietermaritzburg decided the arms deal case could proceed. Judge Nkosinathi Chili said the interests of justice called for the matter to move ahead.
That was a big moment. Over the years, the defence has raised one legal challenge after another, and each one pushed the real trial further out of reach. The judge’s decision showed the court was ready to stop the waiting and start hearing evidence.
Why This Case Has Taken So Long
You can blame a mix of things. Judges and prosecutors have stepped aside from the matter (that’s what a recusal is), and every time it happens, someone new has to be found and brought up to speed. Add a pile of procedural fights on top, and years slip by.
All of this has given us a phrase many South Africans now recognise: the Stop Stalingrad strategy. It describes a tactic where one side keeps appealing and appealing, hoping to wear a case down until it loses steam.
To be fair, every accused person has the right to challenge decisions in court. That right matters in any fair system. The complaint from critics is about what happens when those challenges seem to never stop.
The Arms Deal Background
If you’re new to this story, a quick look back helps. In the late 1990s, South Africa bought military equipment from several foreign companies. Questions about corruption around that purchase have hung over the country for more than twenty years.
Thales is the French company named in this case. Zuma, a former president, is the other accused. So the trial puts a former head of state and a major international defence company in the same courtroom.
That’s why so many people care. This corruption case is a test of whether the justice system can carry a huge, complicated matter all the way to the end. Public trust depends on it, and plenty of South Africans feel exactly that.
The Zuma Foundation Pushes Back
Not everyone is happy with how things have gone. After the May ruling, the JG Zuma Foundation called the decision irrational. It argued the ruling made little sense because proceedings were still pending at the Supreme Court of Appeal, where an application was seeking a permanent stay of prosecution. If granted, that would end the case altogether.
The foundation’s Mzwanele Manyi didn’t hide his frustration. He said it was deeply troubling to watch the justice system ignore fairness, rationality and due process in a matter that has dragged on for over two decades. He also pointed out that not a single witness has been led against the former president so far.
That’s a simple point, but it lands. After all these years, no evidence has been tested before a trial court in this matter. The February 2027 date is meant to change that.
Key Facts at a Glance
Here’s a quick table so the main details are easy to follow.
| Detail | What We Know |
|---|---|
| Accused | Former president Jacob Zuma and Thales |
| Charges | Racketeering, fraud, corruption and money laundering |
| Plea (2021) | Not guilty |
| May 2026 ruling | High Court in Pietermaritzburg allowed the case to proceed |
| Judge | Nkosinathi Chili |
| Appeals filed since ruling | None, according to the NPA |
| Trial start date | 1 February 2027 |
What Happens Next
Now it’s all about preparation. The State and the defence will spend the coming months getting ready. When the trial opens, the court will hear witnesses and look at evidence for the very first time in this long story.
A few simple things to keep in mind:
- A trial date is not a verdict. The court still has to hear everything.
- Zuma and Thales have pleaded not guilty, and the law presumes them innocent.
- Delays can still happen in a complex trial, though no appeals are pending right now.
If you want updates straight from the source, the National Prosecuting Authority shares information at npa.gov.za. To understand how the courts work, the Department of Justice has useful material at justice.gov.za.
Why It Matters for Ordinary South Africans
Corruption trials can feel far removed from daily life. But the arms deal has been part of the national conversation for a whole generation. People want to know if powerful figures and big companies play by the same rules as everybody else.
A trial that finally begins after years of legal manoeuvring would send a strong message about accountability. And whatever happens in the end, most people just want the matter heard openly and decided fairly.
It’s also easy to forget how long this road has been. The case has outlasted plenty of political and legal changes in the country. For some, the slow pace has been maddening. For others, it shows how tricky and sensitive prosecutions at this level can be.
The Road Ahead
The next few months will be watched closely. The Jacob Zuma corruption trial is due to open in February 2027, and the Thales arms deal case will finally leave the paperwork behind and enter the courtroom.
For now, the facts are clear. No appeals are pending, the date is set, and the May ruling still stands. What comes next depends on what the court hears and how the evidence holds up.
Until then, expect plenty of debate and a lot of eyes on Pietermaritzburg. We’ll keep following the story as it develops.
About the Author
